According to an article published by Reuters, 5th October 2012 Samsung Expected to reach End of Record Run. Available at <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/06/technology/samsung-expected-to-reach-end-of-record-run.html?ref=business> .Samsung has enjoyed a quarterly profit of almost double the profit of last year, this is mainly due to the success of sales of the high-end televisions and its smartphones. The Galaxy modelled smartphones was the main money-maker for Samsung which the model Samsung Galaxy S3 alone sold over 20 million units in just over a month.
The huge success in large volume sales of the
Samsung smartphones is owed to the marketing department in Samsung which
emphasizes a lot on advertising to capture the interest of consumers. Advertisements
are one thing but choosing the venue and time to advertise the products is
another thing. The marketing team of Samsung made a good choice in promoting
their smartphones during the 2012 Olympics held in London. Many people tune in and follow Olympic Games
and the medal tally closely and during the commercial break this was when many
people got to know about the Samsung smartphones and its features. It is said
that Samsung spent over $2.7billion just on advertising during the 2012
Olympics.
Since there was so much hype and talk about
the all new Samsung Galaxy S3 it was not surprising that there were
difficulties in the supply side to meet the demand for this new smartphone. The
Samsung Galaxy is considered a normal good as it comes with a hefty price
whereby not everyone who wanted a Samsung Galaxy S3 could just get it. However,
during the first launch of the smartphone its demand was price inelastic as
many people wanted to get their hand on it, therefore people prioritise the
urge of having a Samsung Galaxy S3 ahead of their needs. But human wants are
unlimited but the resources are limited, and in this case it is the labour that
was the problem of why the supply could keep up with the demand of the
smartphone. But at that point of time the market was in equilibrium as shown in
Figure 1.
Figure 1
However, after two months into the launch of
the Samsung Galaxy S3 the demand for it became more elastic because of the
other substitutes of newer smartphones such as the IPhone and Blackberry. When
the demand is elastic, an increase in price will lead to a bigger than
proportionate change in demand for the Samsung Galaxy S3. If the price of the
Samsung Galaxy S3 was priced too high, then consumers would rather switch to
other substitutes. When the demand of the Samsung Galaxy S3 decreases the
demand its complements such as the casing or protective cover for it will also
follow suit. The sales of the complementary goods would decline and the firms
producing it will incur losses as they cannot clear the stock that they have
had produced.
In order for Samsung to reap economies of
scale and continue increasing their profit they must be able to lower the long
run average cost by producing a higher number of goods and also produce at the
lowest point on the long run average cost curve. This can be done by investing
in research and development to come out with new bigger machines to produce the
smartphones at cheaper cost as they can produce higher quantities. When the
quantity of smartphones being produce increases the average cost decreases
because the fixed cost needed to produce the smartphones can be spread out over
the high number of smartphones produced. Besides that, Samsung can also
implement division of labour which can lead the specialization hence increasing
the efficiency and ultimately decreasing the cost of production. Samsung will
want to produce at the minimum efficient of scale as shown in Figure 2.
On the other hand, if Samsung wish to increase
their revenue they should continue selling their smartphones at lower prices in
regions where the demand is elastic. Because even when the price is decreased
the quantity demanded for the smartphone will increase by more than the priced
decrease this will increase the total revenue at an increasing rate. Samsung
should stop decreasing the price of the smartphone when the demand is unit
elastic. This is the point whereby the change in price of the smartphone equals
to the change in quantity demanded for the smartphone, the total revenue is
maximized at this point. In contrary where else in regions where the demand for
smart phones is demand inelastic, Samsung should increase the price of their
smart phones. This is because when the price is increased the quantity demand
for smartphones will decrease less than the price is increased. At this region
Samsung will be still increasing total revenue but at a decreasing rate.
The government can play a role in helping both
Samsung maintain their profits and also help out the consumers. The government
can start off by providing subsidies to Samsung which will be able to lower the
cost of production. This will enable Samsung to produce more smartphones and
increase the supply of smartphones. When the supply is increased, it will cause
the supply curve to shift to the right which will lower the price of
smartphones being sold. More consumers will be able to afford and enjoy the
smartphone as the prices are now lowered and a new market equilibrium has been
formed. However if the government gives too much subsidies to Samsung then they
might turn Samsung into a monopoly power which will have the power over the
whole market. So the government has to be wise in terms of decision making and
to which producers the subsidies are actually given to and not just blindly
giving out subsidies to every producer.
In any event, Samsung has to be careful on what
decisions they make if they want to keep their profits up. Because their arch
rival, Apple which is also mainly in the smartphone business and other big
companies such HTC and Sony are watching over Samsung’s every single move and
will not hesitate to take advantage of the situation for their own gains and
benefits. At this point of time in the fast paced moving world, it can be
anybody’s game. One small mistake can lead to a huge blunder which will make
you fall behind your competition.
Good job, keep it up :)
ReplyDeleteSamsung is leading the market as i can see on the news. Great article, keep it up. =D
ReplyDeletewell done.
Not bad an analysis, very informative.
ReplyDeleteGood analysis and research. Interesting perspective and points. Looking forward for more. Anyways, well done.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that I am using an S3 proves that samsung is pretty much the top mobile phone in the market at the moment. Enjoyed reading this, though elaborating more on Samsung's competition would be nice.
ReplyDeletevery informative, keep up the good job :)
ReplyDeleteClear economics concepts applied in this article. However, I personally think that there should be slight discussion on what are difficulties overcome by samsung in order to be the leading mobile phone company.
ReplyDeleteGreat work!. but practicing price discrimination may be harmful if is based on geographical location. If the price increased due to demand-inelastic, this will benefits foreigners from different country and harms the domestic lower class citizens. The price may be too high for some people to afford in the home market and hence standard of living will fall. Just my two cents :)~
ReplyDeleteLOL! Dear Mr Tony Stark are you yourself using an S3? Is that the only reason why u said great work?
DeleteFood for thought right there my fellow billionaire.